AECCafe
   >> AECCafe User News and Reviews
Thread views: 25015 View all threadsNext thread*

Richard Stafursky
(Unregistered)
07/16/09 06:26 AM
Richard Stafursky Report this article as Inappropriate to us !!!Login to Reply

The brownfield should have been returned to the natural landscape. Extending a massive building footprint into the natural landscape does not show respect for wildlife or the natural landscape.
HQ buildings (designed for people) must always be located in cities. It is arrogant to build in the natural landscape when you say you are defending it. Green design is only what you say it is. I do not respect this architect. The building and facilities must be removed.
Richard Stafursky
(802) 257-9158
Word Species LIst Forest (WSLF)
http://wslfconwaymausa.blogspot.com/search?q=skin


Entire thread
SubjectPosted byPosted on
*International Fund for Animal Welfare Headquarters a Top 10 *DELETED*  07/16/09 06:26 AM
.*Richard StafurskyRichard Stafursky  07/16/09 06:26 AM
Jump to

 

Kenesto: 30 day trial
Digital Cities
CADalog.com - Countless CAD add-ons, plug-ins and more.



© 2020 Internet Business Systems, Inc.
670 Aberdeen Way, Milpitas, CA 95035
+1 (408) 882-6554 — Contact Us, or visit our other sites:
TechJobsCafe - Technical Jobs and Resumes EDACafe - Electronic Design Automation GISCafe - Geographical Information Services  MCADCafe - Mechanical Design and Engineering ShareCG - Share Computer Graphic (CG) Animation, 3D Art and 3D Models
  Privacy PolicyAdvertise